Journal Article 2013
Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to Assess Material Transfer in the Layawan Watershed, Mindanao, Philippines and Its Implications on Payment for Ecosystem Services
Abstrak
Soil and water are the most important resources in the watershed. The alterations on the quantity and quality of
these resources do not only have on-site impacts, but are experienced by off-site communities as well. To assess
the material transfer and identify critical sub-basins in the Layawan Watershed, Mindanao, Philippines; the Soil
and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model was used. The model was also used to investigate changes in land
use. Results show that a 4% reduction in sediment concentration and sediment yield in the critical sub-basins
will be achieved if the community-based watershed management plan is implemented. On the other hand, there
will be a 106% increase in sediment concentration and sediment yield if forests are cleared for utilization,
primarily for agriculture, in the critical sub-basins. Modeling sediment yield and sediment concentration is
important to help policy makers, environmental managers, and development agencies predict the impact of
activities on soil and water quality, as well as guide them in the implementation of payments for ecosystem
services (PES) schemes. The quantification of ecosystem services has been a major challenge surrounding the
success of PES. In the Layawan Watershed, it is shown that land change use will not likely affect water quantity,
it will, however, heavily impact water quality. Modeling provides an avenue to manage watersheds effectively
and efficiently. SWAT running on open source GIS could help budget-constrained government units and
development agencies to better predict the impact of programs and projects on watersheds.
Detail publikasi
Kata kunci
Berkas
Sitasi
Palao LK, Dorado MM, Anit KP and Lasco RD. 2013. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to Assess Material Transfer in the Layawan Watershed, Mindanao, Philippines and Its Implications on Payment for Ecosystem Services. Journal of Sustainable Development. 6(6):P. 73-88. URL
